How
Do I Win?
Early in
one’s life, the foundation is set on values, ethics, and overall perception of
life. This is quite dangerous for someone who has Asperger’s. How so? With
everything I’ve written, I have constantly said that the firsts are important,
and in recent thinking, I have learned that it is even more so.
Parents
with children affected have a fine line to tread. With my game theory, I stated
that I operate best in a game because the rules outline actions taken. Life can
become a game, though, and while the rules are unwritten, there’s one
underlying question that I still haven’t answered, “How do I win?”
From the
point one can realize their surroundings, they are subjected to ways to win.
Television bombards us with winning situations. These situations come in all
sizes, whether it is the Road Runner outwitting the Coyote, or a contestant
winning a huge wad of cash on a game show. Sitcoms even have winners, as
someone always wins some social situation.
If you
aren’t watching television, video games are chock full of winning situations,
as I am not sure if there’s any game that has an ending that is merely a tie.
In movies, too, the good guy always wins.
So with
everyone being surrounded by winners, how does one win the game of life? How
does one know if they are succeeding? Beyond that, what are the criteria for
even playing the game?
This is why
parents have a thin sheet of ice to skate on and why they have to be completely
unselfish. Should, in the early years of a child’s life, the parent teach that
anyone unlike them is bad, part of the game will be to hate others. Should the
parent only care about them and no one else, the game of life becomes a
solitary game. Should the parent physically beat those around them to maintain
their dominance, the child will learn that the game of life is to have complete
power.
So if the
parent teaches what the criteria is, then when the child grows up, how will
they know if they’ve won? The problem is they won’t. Physical abuse will become
worse because there will be no bells, whistles, or confetti that says,
“Congratulations, you have complete control and everyone hates you!”
We are
constantly shown graphics of how any event is going. Tune into CNBC and they’ll show you a thousand
different charts of how any given financial thing is going. Tune into ESPN and they’ll show you a graph of how
any given football team has done the past five years. With either of those two
things, though, what is there beyond the graph? What happens after a team wins
the Super Bowl? What is there left to do? And with the financial markets, how
does one know when something has gone up enough? In other words, once you’ve
won, why play on? What is there left to do?
Is
enjoyment of life the way to win? If so, when does one fully win? We are taught
that everything has a beginning and an end, as games have rules with ends, and
your favorite TV show probably ends at the top of the hour, but how does one
win this game? Is death the final way to win? Is life like a timed game of
“Monopoly,” and when the clock reaches zero, one is judged on the accumulated
wealth?
All of
these questions are truly relevant, but imagine what my questions would be had
my parents been full of hate and rage. The hate and rage would have been passed
on, and perhaps the questions asked wouldn’t be so innocent. Life’s goals may
truly be unclear, and a winner may never be announced, but in the end, perhaps,
it’s not who wins the game, but how you play the game—even if you don’t know
what game you’re playing or how to play.
No comments:
Post a Comment